« we who are poor | Main | Logos Hope »

February 04, 2004

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5bb353ef00d83455db1a69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Emerging Church Definition 3.0:

» Definition of Emerging Church from Dan on Everything
There has much talk recently among Christian bloggers regarding the definition of "Emerging Church". Knightopia has a handy summary of the recent posts on the subject. Plus there's the small matter of the rather lame definition I added to Wiki... [Read More]

» Definition of Emerging Church from Dan on Everything
There has much talk recently among Christian bloggers regarding the definition of "Emerging Church". Knightopia has a handy summary of the recent posts on the subject. Plus there's the small matter of the rather lame definition I added to Wiki... [Read More]

» emerging, submerging, whatever from Waving or Drowning?
Andrew Jones has been holding court on a definition for the emerging church for the past few days (and many [Read More]

Comments

maggi

Poor old church. You are very down on us, aren't you?

[ANDREW] Hi Maggi!
I hope i dont come across like that. i have spent the last 20 years giving everything i have to building the Body of Christ. One of the reasons is because when i was a teenager, the people i introduced to Jesus did not end up staying in the traditional churches. I figured that we just need to start new churches planting movements around the world if we are to fulfil the great commission. I understand the English situation - of having empty churches that need to get filled, but i also understand (and have experienced) the manipulation that sometimes happens when religious professionals are too determined to get new people into their own buildings, rather than releasing people to start new wineskins.
If we are to get the job done, we have to start new structures for the new people - i pray that we will not step on toes when we do this, and i certainly recommend that church starters DO NOT take people from existing churches.
perhaps you could advise young emerging church planters how to succeed in starting thousands of churches and at the same time, stay in good relationship with the older churches, or even to bless them at the same time.

Stephen

I'm curious about "the" emerging generation in the question for tomorrow. From where I'm sitting (here in Auckland, NZ) there is no single united demographic - plurality in ethnicity, language, economic power and religious belief make it hard to identify just one group. And each is developing their own narratives. Do you have a specific group in mind?

George

In the words of MLK
"Free at last, Free at last, thank God Almighty i'm Free at Last"!
Thanks for speaking what we all feel!
Peace

maggi

Hi again. happy thursday :)
you said above -
"I understand the English situation - of having empty churches that need to get filled, but i also understand (and have experienced) the manipulation that sometimes happens when religious professionals are too determined to get new people into their own buildings, rather than releasing people to start new wineskins."
Why is it that when I invite people into the Body of Christ it's a manipulative determination to get new people into my building, but when you invite people to some new thing or other, that's making "a new wineskin"?
Much of your critique on new forms is interesting, but it would be a great shambles if this turned into an ecclesiastical "us v. them" - England saw enough of that in the 1980's and we're only now beginning to recover from the fallout. Maybe you need to hang around in England a bit longer and soak up what's happening here: there is tremendous potential for the 'emerging' mindset to RENEW, not divide the church.

Incidentally, as you're interested in cinema, I have a fab seminar coming up on the subject. Would you like to join us?

Richard Sudworth

Just a little note on the lovely picture of the "great body in a frumpy dress". I think this dissonance about what the body of Christ is like is actually a biblical one. John Wimber used to talk about getting this beautiful bride ready rather than having this wreck of a body waiting at the altar. However, I wonder whether, as we look at the body of Christ, we need to see the literal body of Christ on the cross. I hear the sense of hope and optimism and the prophetic yearning that "things should and can be better". We're missing the point though if we aren't capable of seeing the church as inevitably broken, fractured and pitiful to some degree, as Christ, to some degree is. For me, the heart of what emerging church (whatever term you like...) is that we are embracing those small, fractured, broken expressions of church. Though I agree with your comments about the mega churches, emerging church is by its very nature, not going to be mega, not going to be programmatic, not going to be dramatic. The bride at the altar in Revelation is also matched with the hosts of heaven around the throne....and there at the centre is a slain lamb!

maggi

hear hear, richard.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Streams

  • Twitter Upcoming YouTube Bebo del.icio.us Digg Facebook Flickr LinkedIn Ning Skype Technorati PrayerFeeder Cocomment Doppler - trip schedule Shelfari - books i am reading

Subscribe

  • TwitterCounter for @tallskinnykiwi

Tweet Tweet

Seek and Find

  • Search This Site

Google Ads

Adify Sponsors

Traveler IQ


My Photo
Blog powered by TypePad